This is a
time of year for memories, and the ones that keep bothering me are from
my childhood, which seemed at the time to be wholly happy and
untroubled.
Yet
all the adults in my life still dwelt in the shadow of recent war. This
was not the glamorous, exciting side of war, but the miserable, fearful
and hungry aspect.
My
mother, even in middle-class suburban prosperity, couldn’t throw away
an eggshell without running her finger round it to get out the last of
the white. No butcher dared twice to try to cheat her on the weights.
Haunted
all her life by rationing, she would habitually break a chocolate bar
into its smallest pieces. She had also been bombed from the air in
Liverpool, and had developed a fatalism to cope with the nightly danger
of being blown to pieces, shocking to me then and since.
I
am now beset by these ingrained memories of shortage and danger because
I seem surrounded by people who think that war might be fun. This seems
to happen when wartime generations are pushed aside by their children,
who need to learn the truth all over again.
It
seemed fairly clear to me from her experiences that war had in fact
been a miserable affair of fear, hunger, threadbare darned clothes,
broken windows and insolent officials. And that was a victory, more or
less, though my father (who fought in it) was never sure of that.
Now
I seem surrounded by people who actively want a war with Russia, a war
we all might lose. They seem to believe that we are living in a real
life Lord Of The Rings, in which Moscow is Mordor and Vladimir Putin is
Sauron. Some humorous artists in Moscow, who have noticed this, have
actually tried to set up a giant Eye of Sauron on a Moscow tower.
We
think we are the heroes, setting out with brave hearts to confront the
Dark Lord, and free the saintly Ukrainians from his wicked grasp.
This
is all the most utter garbage. Since 1989, Moscow, the supposed
aggressor, has – without fighting or losing a war – peacefully ceded
control over roughly 180 million people, and roughly 700,000 square
miles of valuable territory.
The
EU (and its military wing, Nato) have in the same period gained control
over more than 120 million of those people, and almost 400,000 of those
square miles.
Until a year
ago, Ukraine remained non-aligned between the two great European
powers. But the EU wanted its land, its 48 million people (such a
reservoir of cheap labour!) its Black Sea coast, its coal and its wheat.
So first, it spent £300 million (some of it yours) on anti-Russian ‘civil society’ groups in Ukraine.
Then
EU and Nato politicians broke all the rules of diplomacy and descended
on Kiev to take sides with demonstrators who demanded that Ukraine align
itself with the EU.
Imagine how
you’d feel if Russian politicians had appeared in Edinburgh in September
urging the Scots to vote for independence, or if Russian money had been
used to fund pro-independence organisations.
Then
a violent crowd (20 police officers died at its hands, according to the
UN) drove the elected president from office, in violation of the
Ukrainian constitution.
During
all this process, Ukraine remained what it had been from the start –
horrendously corrupt and dominated by shady oligarchs, pretty much like
Russia.
If you didn’t want to take sides in this mess, I wouldn’t at all blame you. But most people seem to be doing so.
Taking sides: Britain and the US have
backed the Gulf states' desire to destroy the Assad government in Syria.
While Russia has been a major obstacle
There seems to be a genuine appetite for confrontation in Washington, Brussels, London… and Saudi Arabia.
There
is a complacent joy abroad about the collapse of the rouble, brought
about by the mysterious fall in the world’s oil price.
It’s
odd to gloat about this strange development, which is also destroying
jobs and business in this country. Why are the Gulf oil states not
acting – as they easily could and normally would – to prop up the price
of the product that makes them rich?
I
do not know, but there’s no doubt that Mr Putin’s Russia has been a
major obstacle to the Gulf states’ desire to destroy the Assad
government in Syria, and that the USA and Britain have (for reasons I
long to know) taken the Gulf’s side in this.
But
do we have any idea what we are doing? Ordinary Russians are pretty
stoical and have endured horrors unimaginable to most of us, including a
currency collapse in 1998 that ruined millions. But until this week
they had some hope.
If
anyone really is trying to punish the Russian people for being
patriotic, by debauching the rouble, I cannot imagine anything more
irresponsible. It was the destruction of the German mark in 1922, and
the wipeout of the middle class that resulted, which led directly to
Hitler.
Stupid,
ill-informed people nowadays like to compare Mr Putin with Hitler. I
warn them and you that, if we succeed in overthrowing Mr Putin by
unleashing hyper-inflation in Russia, we may find out what a Russian
Hitler is really like. And that a war in Europe is anything but fun.
So,
as it’s almost Christmas, let us sing with some attention that bleakest
and yet loveliest of carols, It Came Upon The Midnight Clear, stressing
the lines that run ‘Man at war with man hears not the love song which
they bring. Oh, hush the noise, ye men of strife, and hear the angels
sing’.
Or gloat at your peril over the scenes of panic in Moscow.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2882208/PETER-HITCHENS-Forget-evil-Putin-bloodthirsty-warmongers.html
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий